Major Economists Everywhere Are Freaking Out Over The Scarcity Of Safe Assets

Amid elevated market uncertainty, investors have been clamoring to get their hands on so-called "safe assets," privately and publicly issued securities with little risk used to hedge against more volatile investments.

Of primary focus has been sovereign bonds. U.S. government Treasuries, Japanese government bonds, and German bunds are trading at record highs, yielding little profit for investors.

But the scarcity—and thus the high price of these securities—has been exacerbated by central bank measures taken to mend the troubles of the crisis. 

Since the financial crisis, quantitative easing has essentially given banks in the U.S. and U.K fast cash in exchange for Treasuries and gilts, and immediately freed up funds to put money in riskier places that would spur corporate growth.

However now investors are worried that the long-term effects of driving up the cost of safe assets will make it harder for institutional investors like investment banks and hedge funds to meet the stricter standards of new rules put in place to ensure financial stability.

PIMCO's Mohamed El-Erian expressed this anxiety in a speech to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis yesterday. "In the last three plus years, central banks have had little choice but to do the unsustainable in order to sustain the unsustainable until others do the sustainable to restore sustainability," he said. " In the case of three institutions in particular (the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan and the Fed), they also change the balance between “safe” and other assets in the financial system."

The International Monetary Fund has seconded this concern. A team of IMF economists led by Silvia Iorgova describe the crux of this problem in a report out this week (pdf):

The shrinking set of assets perceived as safe, now limited to mostly high-quality sovereign debt, coupled with growing demand, can have negative implications for global financial stability. It will increase the price of safety and compel investors to move down the safety scale as they scramble to obtain scarce assets. Safe asset scarcity could lead to more short-term volatility jumps, herding behavior, and runs on sovereign debt.

Essentially, because there are fewer safe assets, investors are forced to move to riskier assets less agile at hedging their bets if they want to invest at all.

Click for larger image.

This behavior has been compounded by recent regulations made to make the financial industry more stable in the long run:

The advent of new regulations may force banks to hold even more safe assets. For example, on the liquidity side, unless banks alter their liability structure to moderate their liquidity needs, the requirements of the new Basel III Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) alone could further increase the demand for safe assets by some $2 trillion to $4 trillion worldwide (see Box 3.4). An increase in the risk weights of riskier sovereigns could also spur stronger demand for the safest sovereign assets (see Box 3.3). In addition, business uncertainty is likely to put upward pressures on such demand.

But is this a bad thing? In the last few years, we've seen a housing bubble turned into a full-scale financial crisis and a financial crisis become a sovereign debt crisis largely because investors miscalculated the risk of their investments when all did not go according to plan. In that sense, the re-pricing of historically safe assets—particularly government debt—to account for risk is an important move towards long-term sustainability.

Further, Economist Paul Krugman argued yesterday that compounding worries about the lack of safe assets are overblown:

Surely the main point is that the major economies seem likely to remain depressed for a long time, and that as a result short-term interest rates are likely to stay low for a long time too — which means that long rates, which largely reflect expected short rates, are low right now...

My point is that the “safe asset” meme seems to imply that there’s some kind of market aberration in the high prices (and low yields) of bonds, that investors are willing to lose money because they’re frightened. But most of what we’re seeing just reflects a perceived lack of good investment opportunities.

On the other hand, the IMF makes the case that the shortage of safe asset opportunities is compounding the very problems that sparked this behavior in the first place. Sustained high prices of safe assets backfire on the impetus for QE in the first place, restricting rather than expanding investment:

Considerable upward pressures on the demand for safe assets at a time of declining supply entails sizable risks for global financial stability. The unmet demand drives up the price of safety, with the safest assets affected first. In their search for safety, investors that are unable to pay the higher prices are likely to settle for assets that embed higher risks than desired...Such frictions in funding markets can reduce the ability of financial institutions—including investment banks, asset managers, and hedge funds—to secure funding or onlend excess funds.

This funding pressure carries over to sovereigns that are not as creditworthy as others, increasing opportunities for disruptive shocks. This is of particular concern in Europe right now. Once again, from the IMF: 

Banking sector stress can create higher contingent liabilities for the sovereign sector or the need for outright government support. If risk weights suddenly increase, banks may be prompted to deleverage by curbing new lending, leading to a dampening effect on economic growth, and to secondary effects on sovereigns via weaker tax revenues. Ultimately, this could exacerbate negative feedback loops between sovereigns and the banking sector, as has been observed in parts of Europe in recent months.

Click for larger image.

Obviously, this does not paint a rosy picture. According to the IMF, the only successful method of alleviating this problem has been high liquidity, but central bank measures to do this provide diminishing return, as we can see with the decreasing effect of successive rounds of Fed QE on the markets.

But is this a "market aberration"? Is the shortage of safe assets generating a problem that the market will struggle to correct?

In a blog entry yesterday, Brad DeLong argues that all the signs point to a bigger problem than a simple shortage of good investment opportunities, suggesting that the problem is self-reinforcing:

Equities do not seem to be selling at extraordinarily high earnings multiples now--which is what we would expect to see if the root problem were just a shortage of good investment opportunities. When there is a shortage of good investment opportunities--an excess demand for savings vehicles, ex ante full-employment savings greater than ex-ante full-employment investment in the Wicksellian-Keynesian-Hicksian framework--interest rates and earnings yields tend to all be unusually low. Today it is just interest rates on assets perceived as safe that are unusually low. And boy are they unusually low!

While asset re-pricing is desirable in the long run, the IMF argues, in the short run institutions must be careful not to move too fast on sustainability regulations that would limit bank lending. Meanwhile, El-Erian argues that central banks should be careful not to exacerbate the safe asset shortage through more QE.

We see the case for concerns about safe assets, but their direct effect on funding pressures and the slow recovery remains unclear. There are plenty of reasons to be cautious about investing right now—Europe, oil, China, to name a few—even while U.S. corporates and the U.S. economy look to be on a stronger path to recovery, so the distinct effect of a safe asset shortage is hard to measure.

Either way, this does seem like the best argument against central bank action and quick implementation of financial regulation that we've seen yet.

SEE ALSO: Another huge debate between Paul Krugman and Steve Keen >

More From Business Insider

Quiz: How well do you know India's economy?

Question 1

Which of these products is India the world's largest producer of?

Poll Choice Options
  • Wheat
  • Rice
  • Milk

Latest News

  • Colorful Fabrics Restore a 'Dilapidated Concrete Bungalow'

    Click here to view the full photogallery.Photos by Simon Upton/Elle Decor Enchanted by the "wild dogs and unrestored, decaying palazzos" of Lecce, a historic city in Puglia, Italy, fashion designer Liza Bruce and her husband, artist Nicholas Alvis Vega,... …

  • Break the Mold With a Brutalist 'Tree House' on the Chesapeake

    Click here to view the full photogallery. Up for $1.29M on Maryland's Gibson Island is this atypical Chesapeake cottage, a 2,826-square-foot fortress designed by blocky brutalism extraordinaire, Ulrich Franzen. Known as the Glass Tree House, the 1962 three-bedroom was... …

  • Rajaratnam's brother loses bid to dismiss insider trading charges

    Rengan Rajaratnam, the younger brother of imprisoned hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam, on Friday lost a bid to dismiss some of the insider trading charges leveled against him last year. U.S. District ... …

  • Inside Karim Rashid's Magical, Hot Pink 'Sparkle Krib'

    Click here to view the full photogallery. Give designer Karim Rashid pretty much anything—a condo tower, a food court, a record album, a Twitter account—and he'll be sure to make it fruit-punch colored and amorphous, the princess castle of... …

  • 1835 Textile Mill With Labor Rights History is Now Housing

    Here now, Past Lives, in which Curbed explores what some of the country's most interesting residential buildings used to be before they became livable homes. Care to suggest a building with a fascinating past life? Do drop us a line.... …


  • This might well be India’s biggest Ponzi scam

    It was just too good to be true. Ashok Khital, 45, displays every symptom of a man who knows he's been conned. …

  • India's star studded football league

    High and mighty including Sachin, Salman & Sun Group buy ISL teams …

  • Leaderspeak with Rajesh Janey

    Rajesh Janey, President - India & SAARC, EMC shares many firsts in his life. …

  • Power Hungry

    Gujarat has power round-the-clock. Most other states do not. Why this will matter in the general elections. …

  • Etcetera

    The most keenly watched contest of the current general election will be the one for the Varanasi parliamentary seat, where the Bharatiya Janata Party's prime ministerial hopeful Narendra Modi squares off ... …

  • Economy vs Democracy

    As the country gets election fever, cash comes out of mattresses and turns into liquor, gifts, and food. But it is not bad for the health of the economy, reports Sarika Malhotra from the trenches. …

  • Bracing for Challenges

    Raghuram Rajan is preparing to deal with concerns that may arise when a new government takes charge. …


  • Most Actives
    Most Actives
    NamePriceChange% Chg
  • Price % Gainers
    Price % Gainers
    NamePriceChange% Chg
  • Price % Losers
    Price % Losers
    NamePriceChange% Chg
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % ChgChart 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
  • Recent Quotes News

      Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.